KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PEMILU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55108/jkp.v3i1.272Kata Kunci:
restorative justice, elections, law enforcement, election crimesAbstrak
Election law enforcement is one of the important principles for fair elections. In its form, election law enforcement includes election criminal law enforcement. Regulations regarding election criminal law based on Law Number 7 of 2017 are based on retributive justice. In its development, the basis of criminal justice has now begun to change towards restorative justice. This restorative justice aims to provide a form of justice and restoration to victims, by placing perpetrators and victims on an equal footing in the case settlement process. This study uses a juridical method, namely research on positive legal principles and legal principles. In addition, legal interpretation and legal philosophy are also used. The results of the study show that the use of restorative justice for the enforcement of election criminal law in the 2024 election is still not possible, due to the unavailability of an adequate legal basis. Amendments to Law 7 of 2017 must be made to the form of justice that is to be realized. Apart from that, it is necessary to regulate a case settlement mechanism that is capable of realizing restorative justice. However, prevention efforts can be carried out by election supervisors, to minimize the number of cases that must be resolved.
Referensi
Abdul Basid Fuadi, Politik Hukum Pengaturan Keserentakan Pemilu, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol 18 (3), 2021, hlm. 702-723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk18310
Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Barat, Efektitas Penegakan Hukum Pemilu, Bandung: Bawaslu Provinsi Jawa Barat, t.th.
Dewi: Evaluasi Gakkumdu Secara Objektif Temukan Solusi, <https://bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/dewi-evaluasi-akkumdu-secara-objektiftemukan-solusi>diunduh tanggal 27 November 2022.
Eva Achjani Zulfa, Restorative Justice dan Peradilan Pro-Korban, dalam Reparasi dan Kompensasi Korban dalam Restorative Justice System, Jakarta: Kerjasama Antara Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban dengan Departemen Kriminologi FISIP UI, 2011.
Jennifer Furio, Restorative Justive Prison as Hell or a Chance for Redemption?, 2002.John Braithwaite, Restorative Justive & Responsive Regulation, Madison Avenue, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
--------------, Prinsicples of Restorative Justive, dalam Andrew von Hirsch, et.al., (ed.), Restorative Justive and Criminal Justice Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms?, Oregon, USA: Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2003.
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
Khairul Fahmi, Sistem Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemilu, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 12 No. 2, 2015.
Komisi Hukum Nasional RI, Kebijakan Keberpihakan Hukum: Suatu Rekomendasi, Jakarta: Komisi Hukum Nasional RI, 2012.
Marian Liebmann, Restorative Justive How it Works, London and Philadelphia: Jessica KingsleyPublisher, 2007.
Margarita Zernova, Restorative Justive: Ideals and Realities, Hampsire, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2007.
Muladi, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 1998.
Robert Dahl, Perihal Demokrasi: Menjelajahi Teori dan Praktik Demokrasi Secara Singkat, Terjemahan: A. Rahman Zainudin. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor. 2001.
Ramlan Surbakti, Pemilu Berintegritas dan Adil, Harian Kompas edisi 14 Februari 2014.
Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perspektif Eksistensialisme dan Abolisionisme, Bandung: Binacipta, 1996.
Saldi Isra dan Khairul Fahmi, Pemilihan Umum Demokratis, Jakarta: RajaGrando Persada. 2019.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.
Sudi Prayinto, Problematika Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu 2019, Call Paper E v a l u a s i P e m i l u S e r e n t a k 2 0 1 9 , w w w j o u r n a l . k p u . g o . i d , <https://journal.kpu.go.id/index.php/ERE/article/view/146/54>, diunduh tanggal 27 November 2022.
Suyud Margono, ADR dan Arbitrase, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2000.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Dede Kania
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
