NETRALITAS BIROKRASI DAN ABUSE OF POWER DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55108/jkp.v1i1.153Kata Kunci:
netralitas birokrasi, pilkada, abuse of powerAbstrak
Sejak pemilu pertama tahun 1955 hingga Saat ini, terutama sejak diberlakukannya sistem pemilihan langsung kepala daerah, persoalan netralitas birokrasi dan penyalahgunaan kekuasaan semakin mengemuka, Kehadiran norma padal 71 LILI nomor 1 tahun 2015 menjadi instrumen hukum untuk memastikan netralitas birokrasi dan mencegah abuse of power. Namun upaya penegakan hukumnya seringkali mengalami kendala karena adanya perbedaan persepsi dan penafsiran diantara para penegak hukum. Bagaimana penafsiran hukum terhadap beberapa frasa yang dipergunakan dalam pasal 71 ini? Peneliti mengkajinya dengan menggunakan pendekatan conceptual approach yang dipadu dengan Studi atas beberapa putusan pengadilan. Peneliti menemukan bahwasannya norma Pasal 71 dimaksudkan untuk menjaga marwah birokrasi agar dapat tetap mempertahankan netralitas dan professionalismenya. Penggunaan delik formil dalam memaknai frasa "menguntungkan atau merugikan " ( ayat (I) dan (3)) sangat penting untuk mencegah praktek penyalahgunaan sumber daya negara untuk kepentingan politik elektoral. Sedangkan ruang lingkup pemaknaan atas frasa "petahana" (ayat (2) dan (3)) sebaiknya dimaknai dalam arti luas.
Referensi
Parris, Henry. Constitutional Bureaucracy. The Development Of British Central Administration Since The Eighteenth Century, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1969.
Weber, M, "Bureaucracy", dalam J. M. Shafritz & A. C Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration, Thomson Wadsworth, Boston, 2007
Beetham, D Bureaucracy (2nd ed.), MN: University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1996
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Civil service legislation contents checklist. SIGMA Papers NO. 5. Paris: OECD/SIGMA. 1996
Suleiman, E. Dismantling democratic states, NJ: Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003
Sharpe, J. "The relationship between parliament and the civil service". The Parliamentarian. Journal of the Parliaments of the Commonwealth, 74(4). 1993
Kernaghan, K. "Political Rights And Political Neutrality: Finding The Balance Point , Canadian Public Administration, 29(4).1986.
Kernaghan, K. , & Langford, J. W. The responsible public servant. Halifax: The Institute for Research on Public Policy. 1990
Mosher, F. C. Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. Sustainability ofcivil service reforms in central and eastern Europe five years after ELI accession, SIGMA Papers, No. 44, OECD Publishing, 2009.
Hughes, C). E. Public Management And Administration. An introduction (4th ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 2012.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. The Fragmented State - The Challenges Of Combining Efficiency, Institutional Norms And Democracy (Working paper 3). Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies. 2004.
Prebble, M. With Respect. Parliamentarians, Officials, And Judges Too. Wellington, New Zealand: Institute of Policy Studies, 2010.
Ridley, F. F. (1995). Civil Service And Democracy: Questions In Reforming The Civil Service In Eastern And Central Europe. Public Administration and Development, 15(1), 1995.
Aberbach, Putnam, & Rockman, 1981 sebagaimana dikutip oleh Campbell, C., & Peters, B. G. (1988). "The politics/ administration dichotomy: Death or merely change?" Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 1 (1).
Kernaghan, K. Politics, Policy And Public Servants: Political Neutrality Revisited. Canadian Public Administration, 19(3), 1976.
Caiden, G. E. "The concept of neutrality". dalam H. K. Asmerom & E. P. Reis (Eds.), Democratization And Bureaucratic Neutrality (pp. 20-44). London: Macmillan Press Ltd. 1996.
IFES, Abuse of State Resources Research and Assessment Framework: Guidelines for the Democracy and Governance Community of Practice, 2018.
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR), Handbook for the Observation of Campaign Finance 66. 2015
Annan, K. , E. Z. Ponce de Leon, M. Ahtisaari, M. K. Albright et al. Deepening democracy: a strategy for improving the integrity of elections worldwide. Report of the Global Commission on Elections, Democracy and Security, Stockholm, 2012.
Megan Ritchie et.al, Unfair Advantage: The Abuse of State Resources in Elections, IFES, 2017
Hojnacki, W. P. (1996). "Politicization as a civil service dilemma". dalam H. A. G. M. Bekke, J. L. Perry, & T. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Civil Service Systems In Comparative Perspective (pp. 137-164). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996.
Riggs, F. W. (1988). "Bureaucratic politics in the US: Benchmarks for comparison".
Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 1 (4), 1988.
Meyer-Sahling, J .-H. (2008). "The changing colours of the post-communist state: The politicisation of the senior civil service in Hungary". European Journal of Political Research, 470), 2008.
Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. "Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U S. House Elections Grow?" American Journal of Political Science, 1996.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Protecting the Democratic Process; Voter Standing to Challenge Abuse of Incumbency.
Hafner-Burton, Hyde, and Jablonski, Surviving Elections: Election Violence, Incumbent Victory, and Post-Election Repercussions, 2014
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2020 Ahsanul Minan
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
