PUTUSAN MK TENTANG PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD: DARI KONSTITUSIONALITAS KE INSKONSTITUSIONALITAS

Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55108/jkp.v6i2.613

Kata Kunci:

Presidential threshold, constitutionality vs. unconstitutionality

Abstrak

This study analyzes the issue of the presidential threshold (PT)  the minimum support
requirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs in general elections. Set
at either 20 percent of total House of Representatives (DPR) seats or 25 percent of the
national valid vote share from the legislative election, the presidential threshold is often
linked to efforts to manage the number of candidate pairs, encourage early party coalition
formation, and strengthen the stability of the presidential government. Constitutionally,
however, the PT provision was established as a requirement for  serving  as President and
Vice President, rather than as a prerequisite for *nominating* candidates, as stipulated in the
Election Law. This research employs a case study approach regarding the presidential
threshold. The methodology relies on library research, with primary data sourced from
various Constitutional Court (MK) rulings on judicial reviews of the PT retrieved from the
ofcial website (mkri.id) covering the period from 2017 to 2025.

Biografi Penulis

  • Lili Romli, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

    Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

  • Efriza Efriza , Universitas Pamulang

    Dosen Ilmu Pemerintahan di Universitas Pamulang

Referensi

Anggaraini, Titi, 2025, “Setelah 30 Kali Ditolak MK”, Media Indonesia, 6 Januari 2025.

Aris, Muhammad Syaiful, (2022), Pemilu dan Sistem Presidensiil Indonesia, Malang: Setara Press.

Buku Kedua Jilid 3A: Risalah Rapat Panitia AD HOC I Badan Pekerja MPR RI Ke-11 s/d Ke-15 Tanggal 20 Maret s/d 15 Mei 2001 Masa Sidang Tahunan MPR RI Tahun 2001, (2001), Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.

Denzin, Norman K., dan Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2009), Handbook of Qualitative Research, terjemahan Dariyatno, at.all, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar..

Erfandi, dan Fauzi, Akhmad, “Relevansi Penerapan Presidential Threshold Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presiden di Indonesia”, Comserva, Vol. 4, No. 5, September 2024, 1411-1417.

Ghafur, Jamaludin, (2019), Presidential Threshold: Sejarah, Konsep, dan Ambang Batas Persyaratan Calon Pencalonan dalam Tata Hukum di Indonesia, Malang: Intrans Publishing.

Ghofar, Abdul (2018), Problematika Presidential Threshold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Pengalaman di Negara Lain, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 15, No. 3, September 2018.

Huda, Ni’matul, dan Nasef, Imam, (2017), Penataan Demokrasi dan Pemilu di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta: Kencana.

Isra, Saldi, (2017), Pemilu dan Pemulihan Daulat Rakyat, Jakarta: Themis Publishing.

Koran Sindo, “Mencari Angka Ideal Presidential Threshold”, Kamis 14 Juli 2022.

Lipjhart, Arend, ed. 1992, Parliamentary versus Presidential Governnment, New York: Oxford University.

Lipjhart, Arend, ed., (1995), Sistem Pemerintahan Parlementer dan Presidensial (Parliamentary versus Presidential Government), terjemahan Ibrahim R, at.all, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Nazir, M., (2003), Metode Penelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Majalah Konstitusi 2022,, Konstitusionalitas Ambang Batas Capres, Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, No. 181 – Maret 2022.

Mahesa, Desmond J.,2022, “Menghakimi Hakim MK yang Kebingungan Menangani Perkaranya”, Law-Justice.co, 08 Agustus 2020, diakses pada tanggal 11 Agustus 2022.

Muhtadi, Burhanuddin, Aneh di Indonesia Ada Presidential Threshold, dalam https://politik.rmol.id/read/2022/01/07/518500/burhanuddin-muhtadi-aneh-di-indonesia-ada-presidential-threshold, diakses tanggal 8 Agustus 2022.

Pringgar, Rizaldy Fatha. 2020. Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Augmented reality pada pembelajaran siswa. Jurnal IT-EDU. Vol. 05 Nomor 01.

Verney, Douglas V. 1995. “Pemerintahan Parlementer dan Presidensial”, dalam Arend Lijphart, Ssitem Pemerintahan Parlementer dan Presidensial, Jakarta, RajaGrafindo.

Widodo, Hananto, 2022. “Bukan Sekadar Presidential Threshold”, https://jurnal3.net/2022/07/14/bukan-sekedar-presidential-threshold/m, diakses tanggal Agustus 2022.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2025-12-25

Cara Mengutip

Romli, Lili, dan Efriza Efriza. 2025. “PUTUSAN MK TENTANG PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD: DARI KONSTITUSIONALITAS KE INSKONSTITUSIONALITAS”. Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu 6 (2): 75-98. https://doi.org/10.55108/jkp.v6i2.613.

Artikel Serupa

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.