High-Cost Democracy: Stimulus Ijon Politik dalam Pemilu Lokal di Region Kaya Sumber Daya Alam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v5i1.90Kata Kunci:
corruption, elections, natural resources, political bondsAbstrak
This study discusses the practice of political bondage which is increasingly prevalent in various regions in Indonesia. Actually, the cause of political bondage is due to high cost democracy which causes prospective candidates to have to look for sponsors, especially in companies that manage natural resources. So, when the candidate is elected or has officially taken office, he must fulfill the promise that has been agreed between the authorities and the entrepreneur, which promise can be in the form of mining permits, transfer of land functions, and so on. Then, the method used in this research is descriptive qualitative by explaining that political bonds have a correlation with corruption. Then, the researcher uses Ross' main theory which relates the correlation between natural resources that will hinder and hurt democracy. Then, Billon's theory is that natural resources have the ability to motivate and fund various forms of activity. The results of this study show that the existence of political bonds is highly correlated with corruption, because the authorities justify or make something illegal to be legal due to an agreement with businessmen. The corruption of natural resources that dominates the most is in the Pilkada, especially in areas that are rich in natural resources. Entrepreneurs actually also take advantage of the momentum of the Pilkada to be able to enter the gap so that all permits related to natural resources run smoothly and they are protected by the law in their respective regions.
Unduhan
Referensi
Ata, N. (2022). Praktik Ijon Politik Pada Kasus Korupsi Kepala Daerah: Study Kasus Korupsi Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK) Pendidikan di Kabupaten Malang. Journal of Governance Innovation, 4(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v4i1.1187
Azwar, & Subekan, A. (2022). Does Democracy Reduce Corruption in Indonesia? Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 25(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.56886
Budiman, & Agus Riyanto. (2013). Kapita Selekta Kuesioner: Pengetahuan dan Sikap dalam Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Salemba Medika.
Casmi Arrsa, R. (2014). Pemilu Serentak dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x
Chariri, A. (2009). Landasan Filsafat dan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/577/
Coate, M. B. (2002). A Test of Political Control of the Bureaucracy: The Case of Mergers. Economics and Politics, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00097
Edward, A., & Ward, B. (2019). Demokrasi For Sale: Pemilu, Klientelisme, dan Negara di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Fadhlurrohman, M. I., Syarifuddin, T. I., & Etika Khairina. (2021). Political Ethics in Leadership: Impact of Behaviour Ethics Implementation of Regional Heads in Indonesia. Journal of Government and Political Issues, 1(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v1i1.10
Habibi, M. (2020). Ijon Politik Izin Usaha Pertambangan Bentuk Patronase dan Klientelisme dalam Pemilukada Kalimantan Timur Tahun 2018 (Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta). Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://repository.umy.ac.id/handle/123456789/31858
Habibi, M. (2021). A regional head election’s political corruption and new styles of clientelism. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 34(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v34i42021.417-430
Hakim, A. B. (2022). Demokrasi dan Politik Biaya Tinggi (High Cost Politics). JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 1(1), 12–22. Retrieved from https://ejournal.insud.ac.id/index.php/josh/article/view/463
Hendry, D. (2017). Jatam: Waspada Enam Modus Ijon Politik Tambang di Indonesia. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from Mongabay website: https://www.mongabay.co.id/2017/02/10/jatam-waspada-enam-modus-ijon-politik-tambang-di-indonesia/
Hidayat, S. (2006). Bisnis dan Politik di Tingkat Lokal: Pengusaha, Penguasa, dan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah Pasca Pilkada. Jakarta: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI).
JATAM. (2017). Mewaspadai Ijon Politik Pertambangan pada Pemilukada Lembata 2017. Retrieved January 1, 2022, from Jaringan Advokasi Tambang website: https://www.jatam.org/mewaspadai-ijon-politik-pertambangan-pada-pemilukada-lembata-2017/
JATAM. (2021). 2020 Adalah Tahun Panen Ijon Politik Tambang, Kriminalisasi hingga Berujung Bencana. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from Jaringan Advokasi Tambang website: https://www.jatam.org/2020-adalah-tahun-panen-ijon-politik-tambang-kriminalisasi-hingga-berujung-bencana/
Jensen, P. S., & Justesen, M. K. (2014). Poverty and Vote buying: Survey-based Evidence from Africa. Electoral Studies, 33, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.020
KontraS. (2018a). Ijon Politik Pilkada Melanggengkan Krisis Ekologis. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from Komisi Untuk Orang Hilang Dan Korban Tindak Kekerasan website: https://kontras.org/2018/03/14/ijon-politik-pilkada-melanggengkan-krisis-sosial-ekologis/
KontraS. (2018b). Ijon Politik Pilkada Melanggengkan Krisis Sosial Ekologis. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from Komisi Untuk Orang Hilang Dan Korban Tindak Kekerasan website: https://kontras.org/2018/03/14/ijon-politik-pilkada-melanggengkan-krisis-sosial-ekologis/
Le Billon, P. (2001). The Political Ecology of War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflicts. Political Geography, 20(5), 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00015-4
Madung, O. G. (2016). Korupsi, Patronase, dan Demokrasi. Jurnal Ledalero, 15(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.31385/jl.v15i1.26.11-23
Margiansyah, D., Aidulsyah, F., Kurniawan, F. E., Kusumaningrum, D., Aini, Y. N., & Sabilla, K. (2020). Peta Pebisnis di Parlemen: Potret Oligarki di Indonesia. Jakarta. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31169.17765
Medistiara, Y. (2020). Kutip Data Kemendagri, KPK Paparkan Biaya Calon Kepala Daerah Capai Rp 100 M. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from DetikNews website: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5270765/kutip-data-kemendagri-kpk-paparkan-biaya-calon-kepala-daerah-capai-rp-100-m
Moleong, L. J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nahar, M. (2018). Ijon Politik Tambang. Retrieved January 3, 2022, from Jaringan Advokasi Tambang website: https://www.jatam.org/ijon-politik-tambang/
Nawawi, H. (2015). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial.(cetakan ke-14). Gajah mada University press, Yogyakarta, hal, 176.
Prasetyo, W. (2019). Optimalisasi Bekerjanya Pengungkapan Dana Kampanye sebagai Strategi Pencegahan Politik Uang. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 5(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.336
Prianto, B. (2016). Partai Politik, Fenomena Dinasti Politik dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah, dan Desentralisasi. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v1i2.436
Rahma, H., Fauzi, A., Juanda, B., & Widjojanto, B. (2021). Fenomena Natural Resource Curse dalam Pembangunan Wilayah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 21(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v21i2.1358
Ramadhan, M. N., & Oley, J. D. B. (2019). Klientelisme sebagai Perilaku Koruptif dan Demokrasi Banal. Jurnal Antikorupsi Integritas, 5(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.379
Risal, S., Bajari, A. H., & Hergianasari, P. (2022). Sumber Daya Alam dalam Pusaran Pilkada Serentak. Kemudi: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.31629/kemudi.v6i02.3948
Ross, M. L. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325–361. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0011
Sahroni, A., Freddy Prisanto, G., Febrina Ernungtyas, N., & Lintangdesi Afriani, A. (2019). “Politik Tanpa Mahar”: Semiotika Jargon Komuniaksi Partai Nasional Demokrat di Era Demokrasi Biaya Tinggi. Jurnal Semiotika, 13(2), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.30813/s:jk.v13i2.1938
Setiawan, H., & Sa’diyah, K. (2021). The Strength of the Kinship Politics Network and Modalities of Pilar Saga in the 2020 South Tangerang Regional Head Election. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 1(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.1.1.119-130
Sjafrina, A. G. P. (2019). Dampak Politik Uang Terhadap Mahalnya Biaya Pemenangan Pemilu dan Korupsi Politik. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 05(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.389
Tjahjoko, G. T. (2015). Politik Ambivalensi : Nalar Elite di Balik Pemenangan Pilkada (U. N. Ni’mah, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Polgov (Politics and Government) Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Hendy Setiawan, Widyana
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
