Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang Nomor 157/Pid.Sus.Pemilu/2017/Pn Srg Tentang Pelanggaran Tindak Pidana Politik Uang Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
Kata Kunci:Criminal Acts, Supervisor of Elections, Money Politics
The purity of election results is an inseparable thing in a democratic country. To protect the purity of election results, which is very important for democracies, lawmakers have made a number of fraudulent acts in elections a criminal offense. Based on this background, the author wants to conduct a study with the title, Juridical Review of Electoral Crimes in Terms of Politics of Voter Voter Money of governors (Case Study of Serang District Court Decision No. 157/Pid.Sus.Pemilu/2017/PN Srg). The methods in this study are normative legal research with a statutory approach, a case approach, a historical approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. In the end, the researchers concluded that, the regulation of election crimes in cases with Decision Number 157/Pid.Sus.Pemilu/2017/PN Srg is in accordance with laws and regulations. The defendant Hidayat Wijaya Dipura alias Dayat violated 187A paragraph (1) of Law Number 10 of 2016.